Difference Between Crystal Field Theory and Ligand Field Theory

Main Difference – Crystal Field Theory vs Ligand Field Theory

Many scientists and chemists have attempted to formulate theories to explain the bonding of coordination compounds and to justify and predict their properties. The first successful theory is the valence bond theory came out in the 1930s by Linus Pauling. Then in 1929, Hans Bethe proposed a new theory called crystal field theory. The ligand field theory is a modification of the original crystal field theory. In the beginning, the crystal and ligand field theories were largely used to explain the concepts in solid-state physics. However, in the 1950s, chemists started to apply these theories to transition metal complexes. The main difference between crystal field theory and ligand field theory is that crystal field theory describes only the electrostatic interaction between metal ions and ligands, whereas ligand field theory considers both electrostatic interaction and covalent bonding between the metal and its ligand.

This article explains, 

1. What is Crystal Field Theory
      – Theory, Application
2. What is Ligand Field Theory
      – Theory, Application
3. What is the difference between Crystal Field Theory and Ligand Field Theory

Difference Between Crystal Field Theory and Ligand Field Theory - Comparison Summary

What is Crystal Field Theory

The crystal field theory describes the electronic structure of metal crystals, where they are enclosed by oxide ions or anions. The symmetry of the electrostatic field depends on the crystal structure. The d orbitals of the metal ions are split by the electrostatic field and the energies of these d orbitals can be calculated in terms of crystal field stabilization energies. Crystal field theory is used to understand the magnetic, thermodynamic, spectroscopic and kinetic properties of the coordination metal complexes. The main three assumptions of crystal field theory include:

(a) The ligands are considered as point charges,

 (b) No interaction /bonds between orbitals of metal and ligands

(c) In a free metal ion, all the sub-shells of a particular d orbital are of equal energy.

The interactions between metal ions and their ligands are electrostatic in nature. In this theory, no bonding between the atom and the transition metal is considered. Because of this limitation, the crystal field theory is modified and proposed as ligand field theory.

Main Difference - Crystal Field Theory vs Ligand Field Theory

Figure 1: Octahedral splitting

What is Ligand Field Theory?

The ligand field theory is a combination of both crystal field and molecular orbital theories. It was first proposed qualitatively by Griffith and Orgel. Ligand field theory is used to describe the bonding, orbital arrangement and other important characteristics of coordination metal complexes. Moreover, it describes p bonding and provides more accurate calculations of energy levels in terms of ligand field stabilization energies. More precisely, the ligand field theory is used to judge the electron distribution among d orbitals of metal ions and their stereochemical activeness. The description of covalent bonding is not seen in the crystal field theory. Hence, ligand field theory is taken as a more realistic model that can be applied to describe the properties of coordination complexes.

Difference Between Crystal Field Theory and Ligand Field Theory

Figure 2: Ligand-Field scheme summarizing σ-bonding in the octahedral complex [Ti(H2O)6]3+

Difference Between Crystal Field Theory and Ligand Field Theory

Definition

Crystal Field Theory: The crystal field theory is a theory that describes the electronic structure of metal crystals.

Ligand Field Theory: Ligand field theory is a modification of crystal field theory and molecular orbital theory.

Focus

Crystal Field Theory: Crystal field theory only describes electrostatic interactions between metal ions and ligands

Ligand Field Theory: Ligand field theory describes both electrostatic interactions and covalent bonding between metal ions and ligands.

Applications

Crystal Field Theory: Crystal field theory provides only electronic structure of transition metals.

Ligand Field Theory: Ligand field theory provides electronic, optical and bonding characteristics of transition metals.

Realism

Crystal Field Theory: Crystal field theory is comparatively unrealistic

Ligand Field Theory: Ligand field theory is more realistic than crystal field theory.

Summary – Crystal Field Theory and Ligand Field Theory

The crystal field theory is an electrostatic approach that describes the electronic energy levels that govern the UV-visible spectra but does not describe bonding between metal ions and ligands. The ligand field theory is a complete description that is derived from crystal field theory. Unlike the crystal field theory, ligand field theory describes the bonding between metal ions and ligands. This is the difference between crystal field theory and ligand field theory.

Reference:
1.Dabrowiak, J. C. (2009). Metals in medicine. John Wiley & Sons.
2.Huheey, J. E., Keiter, E. A., Keiter, R. L., & Medhi, O. K. (2006). Inorganic chemistry: principles of structure and reactivity. Pearson Education India.
3.Sathyanarayana, D. N. (2001). Electronic absorption spectroscopy and related techniques. Universities Press.
4.Dolmella, A., & Bandoli, G. (1993). Inorganic structural chemistry: By Ulrich Müller, published by Wiley, Chichester, UK, 1993, 264 pp. Inorganica Chimica Acta, 211(1), 126.
5.Bothara, K. G. (2008). Inorganic Pharmaceutical Chemistry. Pragati Books Pvt. Ltd..

Image Courtesy:
1.”Octahedral crystal-field splitting.”By English Wikipedia user YanA via
2. “LFTi(III)”By Smokefoot at English Wikipedia – Transferred from en.wikipedia to Commons by Sentausa. (Public Domain) via

About the Author: Yashoda

Yashoda has been a freelance writer in the field of biology for about four years. He is an expert in conducting research related to polymer chemistry and nano-technology. He holds a B.Sc. (Hons) degree in Applied Science and a Master of Science degree in Industrial Chemistry.

Leave a Comment


Related pages


biannual biennialgerman rottweiler vs american rottweilerwhat does foreshadows meansyntax and semantics differencefunction of a cotyledonexamples of onomatopoeia in a sentencestructure of eosinophilsdefinition pathetic fallacyverse and stanzaforecast nounimmoral vs amoralgluconeogenesis glycolysisparboiling definitiondefinition of valencydistinguish between gram-positive and gram-negative bacteriawarm blooded versus cold bloodedpenetrance vs expressivitywhat is the difference between brazing and solderingelastic vs inelastic collisionsmalinois german shepherdformula for sucrosedefinition of figurative speechwhat is buffered vitamin c meanwhat is the difference between informative and explanatory writingenglish mastiff factspolar moment of inertia formulathe term deceleration meanstypes of prepositionwhat does doppelgangeris a hog a pigwhat does adonde meanamerican bulldog johnson vs scottdifference between curcumin and turmericvernier height gauge least countcompare ionic and covalent bondingasymptotes of a hyperboladifference between transgender and bisexualdifference between participles and gerundsdifference between seeds and seedlingswhat is a tragicomedywhat is the centrosomepteridophytes wikipediadifference between baking soda and cooking sodadifference between a comma and a semicoloncan producer surplus be negativefunctions of cilia and flagellasimple distillation definition chemistryfamous things of kolkatadescribe rolling frictionfiance vs fianceeunicameral legislature meaningdifference in hurricane and typhoonhow to find axis of symmetry of a quadratic functionbicarbonate of soda same as baking sodaproperties of paramagnetic substancesdifference between a calzone and a stromboliallegorical symbolismdiode and zener diode differencecarpe diem literatureverbal irony definition in literatureesthetics or aestheticsde jure statestory about rapunzelguar gum xanthan gumcantonese mandarin differenceelectron proton and neutrondifference between documentary and short filmnames of metallic mineralsdifference between distance and displacement in physicsmeaning cuddlesimilarities between radiowaves and microwavesdifference between a covalent and ionic bond